logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.08.31 2015고단1286
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Basic facts E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) is a contractor awarded a contract for a new construction of “G middle school” in the name “G middle school” (hereinafter “instant construction”) from the office of education in Yong-do. H is a contractor awarded a contract for multi-purpose steel framed construction among the instant construction works.

Defendant

A is an on-site director of the instant construction site who controls, manages, and supervises all matters concerning the safety of workers belonging to E and workers belonging to sewage level, and Defendant B is an on-site driver of the instant construction site who works for E, and Defendant B is a I's on-site driver who is requested for the salvage work of steel structure from H in connection with the multi-purpose steel framed construction.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On December 11, 2014, Defendant A, with respect to the instant construction work, supervised Defendant B by having Defendant B wear the steel-frame structure equivalent to one to three tons of one to three tons of one to three tons of one to three tons of one to three tons of one to three tons of two parts of the steel framed (hereinafter “the instant scrap”) during the instant construction work, and by having the victim J (47 years old), etc. workmen, etc. of H, such as the victim J (47 years old) perform the assembly and assembly work of the steel framed structure raised by Defendant B using the instant scrap on the fourth floor of the instant multi-purpose river.

The construction site in this case was the one where the ground was excavated and the ground was set up, and the ground was weak due to the expenses that had been laid before the ground was set up, and the construction site in this case was no longer 3 days before the accident in this case. Thus, Defendant A, the head of the construction site in this case, was the head of the construction site in this case, prepared a work plan to investigate in advance the topography and ground conditions of the construction site in order to prevent the transfer of the straws in this case due to ground subsidence, and made the foundation of the construction site in this case solid.

arrow