1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants’ respective KRW 74,450,60 per annum from May 18, 2013 to June 18, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur who engages in construction machinery rental business with the trade name B.

The Defendant Sungdo Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Sungdo Construction”) is a company that has been awarded a contract for the construction of a livestock shed located in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun from the Jindo Farming Cooperative. The Defendant Seowon Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Kuwon Industry”) is a company that has been awarded a subcontract for the construction of steel structure among the above construction of a new livestock shed from the Defendant Sungdo Comprehensive Construction. Defendant Hodo Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Hodo Hando Construction”) is a company that has been sub-subcontracted for the construction of steel structure produced by the Defendant Kudo Industries from the Defendant Kudo Integrated Construction.

B. Around May 4, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for Defendant Hayn L&C and Cick-ray use, and directly driven 50 tons nives owned by the Plaintiff at the construction site and moved to a designated location for steel structure.

C. On May 11, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) operated the cream under the direction of D affiliated with the Defendant LAWnB to move the steel structure to a designated location; and (b) caused the Plaintiff’s accident involving the destruction of the cream and damage.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). 【No dispute is raised, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 7, and 10 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 4, 8, and 9, the video of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 8, and 9, the result of the plaintiff's identification, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Liability for damages caused by the accident in this case;

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages equivalent to the repair cost, since the Defendants were negligent in failing to take all necessary measures, such as setting up the ground as the contractor or the work leader, or investigating the stability of the ground, due to ground subsidence in the work site. 2) The Defendant is not a ground subsidence but a working group.