All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserted that the Defendant’s punishment against the lower court is too unreasonable, while the prosecutor appealeded to the effect that it is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The Defendant, who stolen approximately KRW 1150,00,00, did not want to punish the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant had been punished twice as a result of the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime, and despite the fact that he was under the suspended sentence for the same crime, he frequently stolen and did not recover from damage.

On the other hand, among the crimes of this case, the crime Nos. 1 in the annexed table No. 3 of the judgment of the court below among the crimes of this case constitutes a single concurrent crime after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the equality in the case where the judgment was received at the

In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of crime and consequences, etc., the sentence of the lower court is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and is too heavy or minor, in light of such factors as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and means of crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, we cannot accept all the defendant and prosecutor's argument.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in entirety under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.