1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 250,00 and 5% per annum from July 18, 2016 to November 24, 2016 and the next day.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. At around 23:00 on June 11, 2016, the Defendant intruded into the aquaculture operated by the Plaintiff, and stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 8,600,000 in total, such as 1,800,000 per man’s yellow field, which is equivalent to KRW 6,00,000,00 per man’s yellow field, which is equivalent to KRW 8,00,000,000 per man’s yellow field, and KRW 30,000,000 per man’s electric field, etc.

B. The Defendant stolen the key of the active fishing vehicle, thereby preventing the Plaintiff from operating the said vehicle. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to the total amount of KRW 18,410,000, and the total amount of KRW 7,200,000,000, from the fish net, due to the death of the fish belonging to the fishing net.

C. Therefore, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 32,780,000 and damages for delay.

2. Determination

A. Although there is no dispute between the parties as to the fact that a female bals, Habs, Habs, Habs, a male balp, a female balp, a female balp, a female balp, and a horse balp on June 11, 2016, the part concerning the horse balp, Ebs, Habs, Habs, and balb from the fish farm operated by the Plaintiff on June 11, 2016, the above female balp, Ebs, Habs, Habs, and Mabs from the Defendant’s possession, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the entire purport of the argument in the evidence No. 4, the key of the active strings as indicated in the evidence No. 4 (including the fact that there is no dispute between the parties), the Defendant concealed the market price of KRW 2.50,000 in the active strings attached to the strings owned by the Plaintiff in order to prevent the Defendant from leaving the key of KRW 2.50,000 in a grass forest by reducing the key of the 2.50,000 won, and the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 50,000 as of September 28, 2016 due to the above facts constituting the crime of destroying property.

Therefore, the defendant.