1. An insurance contract concluded between the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is null and void.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 2, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant and the insured as the Defendant on the attached list (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. The Defendant was hospitalized at a hospital for 396 days as indicated below on the ground of chills, strokes, and other cerebrovascular diseases. Under the instant insurance contract, the Defendant received KRW 42,60,000 in total from the Plaintiff during the period from June 14, 2010 to January 2, 2012 as listed below.

. The amount of 3.0 0: 10: 2. 3. 4. 2. 1. 1. 1. 1. 4, 20,000 Madul Hospital; 1. 3. 4. 2. 1. 1. 0,000 Madul Hospital; 1. 3. 4. 1. 0,000 Madul Hospital; 1. 4. 2. 1. 3. 1. 0,000 Madul Hospital; 4. 1. 1. 3. 1. 1. 0,00 Madul Hospital; 1. 4. 2. 1. 3. 200 Madul Hospital; 1. 1. 1. 3. 206 Madulul Hospital; 1. 4. 1. 206 Madul 1, 2009 Madul Hospital;

C. On March 10, 2015, the Defendant purchased a total of 19 insurance products with total of 12 insurance companies, including the Plaintiff, in the Cheongju District Court Decision 2013Ma1504, Cheongju District Court Decision 2013Da1504, hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff,” and used the fact that the Defendant paid a large amount of insurance money when he/she is hospitalized for a long time due to disease.