logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.09.08 2016고단620
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendant

A and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 20,000,000 won.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the Director of the Shipbuilding and the Director of the Safety and Health Management of B, and the defendant B is the corporation that employs 13,000 full time workers at H in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with its head office in Jung-gu.

1. Special safety and health supervision performed from September 10, 2015 to September 16, 2015

A. Defendant A (1) The business owner must take necessary measures to prevent risks caused by machinery, apparatus, and other equipment, hazards caused by electricity, heat, and inflammable substances, and safety routes caused by electricity, heat, and other energy in the course of carrying on his/her business, but did not take 34 safety measures as shown in the [Attachment 1] list of crimes, such as allowing workers to work.

(2) A business owner shall take necessary measures to prevent the danger of natural disasters during work at a place where workers might fall down at work, where soil and sand, structures, etc. might collapse, where material objects might fall or come down, or where other risk may occur due to natural disasters during work, but he/she did not take nine safety measures, such as the attached list of crimes (Attachment 2) by failing to install a temporary passage at the work unit (T24) and failing to prevent the danger of fall at the time of moving workers.

(3) Although business owners need to maintain appropriate standards such as ventilation, lighting, lighting, illumination, thermal insulation, damp-proof, cleanliness, etc. in order to prevent health disorder in the course of running their businesses, they did not take a total of 18 safety measures as shown in the [Attachment 3] list, such as failing to secure an adequate view at the location of a block of an outdoor inspection site in the assembly 2 factory of the above factory.

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. is the Defendant A’s 1-A.

as described in paragraph (1).

arrow