logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.25 2016고정15
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, a corporation B (hereinafter referred to as “B”) undertaking this project, is a field director in charge of managing the safety and health affairs of workers belonging to the construction site of multi-family house C located in Chuncheon City, and B is a corporation established for the purpose of housing construction business, etc.

1. The business owner of a defendant A shall take measures necessary for the prevention of any danger at a place where his/her employees might fall down, soil and sand structures, etc. might collapse during his/her work, where material objects might fall or come by flying, where other danger may occur due to natural disasters in the course of his/her work;

In specific safety measures, ① the business owner must pay safety signs to workers who are at the risk of falling, or who are at the risk of falling. However, the Defendant, the business owner, at around 10:00 on June 24, 2015, did not pay safety signs to 8 workers at the second floor of the construction site. ② The business owner, at the end of the work board and the passage or the opening of the passage, should install safety rail at the place where the worker is at the risk of falling. However, the Defendant, the business owner, at the site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site site

2. B The Defendant did not take necessary measures to prevent any danger to workers, such as the Defendant’s act on behalf of the Defendant, as described in the preceding paragraph of the On-Site Director A.

Summary of Evidence

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant A and D;

1. A report on the results of supervision;

arrow