A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at a restaurant for the operation of the victim C in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, the victim’s children E received a claim for damages, thereby hearing the victim’s children E in the course of the lawsuit, and that, “the victim is well aware of the situation between the F lawyer and G Cheong-gu. I would have to bring the lawsuit to him.”

However, in fact, the defendant received money from the victim as attorney fees and expenses, and had the intent to use it as living expenses.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 300,000 won on February 19, 2008 from the victim to receive 30,000 won on the pretext of attorney-at-law appointment and expenses, and acquired 11 times as shown in the attached List of Crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including a cross-examination);

1. Each police statement made to H and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (attached to agricultural cooperatives under the name of the suspect);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 32(1) and Article 25(3)4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation to Dismiss the Compensation Order (it is not reasonable to issue a compensation order in the criminal procedure of this case) provides the victim's difficult circumstances to file a suit due to the reasons for sentencing, which make him/her obtain personal benefits by making a false statement as stated in the facts constituting the crime of this case, increasing doping and equipment, and efforts for the recovery of damage in the investigation process or trial process are not even visible, and the victims' original nature is not cut, the sentence as indicated in the disposition of this case shall be determined in light of the fact that there is a possibility of subsequent repayment in light of the defendant's vindication or family relationship, and the detention of a new soldier shall be suspended by deeming that there is a possibility of subsequent repayment of damage.