The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On July 3, 2011, the Defendant said that “The Defendant would allow the victim E to undergo a trial within one week prior to the trial proceedings.” However, the Defendant did not have any authority over the mediation of the trial schedule and did not have any intention or ability to give the victim prior to the trial proceedings, even if he did not receive the above money from the victim. The Defendant is a woman living together (the “F”) with whom the victim’s name cannot be identified by deceiving the victim and deceiving him.

) throughout Thailand 50,000 U.S. dollars (2 million won in Won)

(2) On August 201, 201, the Defendant provided that the victim E would be punished by a fine at a place where it is not possible to know the place of a police officer.

However, the defendant did not have any authority to release the victim, and even if he received the above money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to force the victim to be released by a fine.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained 20,000 feet (which is equivalent to KRW 800,000) from the victim in the Thailand, and acquired it by fraud.

3 Around July 18, 2011, at a place where the location is unknown, the Defendant stated that “E is detained as a good day, and for E, an attorney-at-law will be appointed.”

However, in fact, the defendant had already been paid the attorney fee of 25,000 fee from E and did not have the intention or ability to use the above money for personal expenses by receiving the above money from the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is under the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.