A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a nameless person who became aware of via the Internet around 2017, stating that “The Defendant would grant a loan to a juristic person on the face of a real-time deposit account, passbook, physical card, etc.; (b) established a so-called “old juristic person” without any substance; and (c) intended to transfer the access media in the name of the juristic person.

1. On September 2016, the Defendant: (a) issued a certificate of personal seal impression, resident registration card, and a certified copy of resident registration card in the resident service center located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) around that time, the Defendant sent the above documents, a certified copy of identification card, and personal seal impression to a person with no personal seal impression.

On September 27, 2016, in the registration division of Suwon District Court 451, as the Sinnam-si of the Sinnam-si of the Gyeonggi-si of the Gyeonggi-do, the person whose name was Buddhist, submitted the documents of application for registration of incorporation of C, along with the documents received from the defendant, even though the fact was not actually paid the capital.

Accordingly, the registry official entered the "Co., Ltd." in the commercial registry computer system, which is the same electronic record as the commercial registry, into computerized data processing system, such as the "C", "Seoul-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul-do, the location of its head office D", "5,000 won", "25,00,000 won" in capital, "25,00,000 won" in the amount of capital, "fishing goods Internet shopping mall", and "A" in the same electronic record as the commercial registry, and immediately stored and operated the commercial registry electronic data processing system

In addition, from that time until September 28, 2016, the Defendant conspiredd with a person with a false name and filed a false report to a public official three times in the same electronic record as the original copy of the fair deed by having him/her record false facts in the same electronic record as the original copy of the fair deed, and exercised such electronic record by storing and operating the same electronic record as the commercial register in which the false facts are recorded.

2. On October 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.