logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.08.17 2017고단3126
사기
Text

The defendant shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant.

Reasons

1. On June 19, 2012, the Defendant of the facts charged: (a) around June 19, 2012, at a mutual infinite restaurant located in the U.S. child in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) caused the victim C to take money to be distributed to a club business in Gangwon-do boat; and (c) caused the victim C to enter the same place.

The apartment house fund is also raised, and if the amount of money is borrowed from the mother and child, it will be paid from 3 to 5 parts of the month.

In making a false statement, “The project plan stating that “The expected annual profit of Yeongdeungpo-gu with KRW 300 million is at least 32,000,000 or maximum of 550,000” was presented to the victim.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any idea to raise the Defendant’s own funds by selling apartment buildings, etc.; rather, the Defendant did not enter the place where a large amount of profit accrued from the Defendant’s worship, but attempted to participate in the pawned business as the so-called “former owner”. However, it is difficult to pay part of the principal borrowed from the damaged person, as it was intended to operate a business by way of remitting money directly to the Defendant or to a kind of broker without any procedure such as accurately analyzing the debtor’s credit or being lawfully refunded a security, etc. However, there is little possibility that the Defendant attempted to operate a business by means of remitting money to the obligor or a kind of broker, and thus, it is difficult to bring about a high-rate interest on the part of the principal borrowed from the damaged person for personal purposes, such as operating expenses of the private teaching institute operated by the Defendant, and there was no other intent or ability to preserve it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 100 million as the borrowed money on the same day, and from around that time to December 2, 2012, borrowed a total of KRW 650,00,000,000 from around 19 times, and repaid only KRW 445,545,00,000, which is the difference, 200,000 won.

arrow