beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
The defendant shall pay C, who is an applicant for compensation, KRW 8,00,000.
3.2
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 703"
1. Fraud against victim D;
A. On April 2016, the Defendant, through E, known to the Defendant at an insular place before and after this day, concluded that “The Defendant borrowed money to the Defendant, as he was able to set monthly income from the insular casino up to a maximum of 10%, and the principal may be repaid after one month.”
However, the defendant did not have operated the pawnpo, and was thought to use the funds borrowed from the victim to F in other places.
Around April 18, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 9 million from the victim, to the G bank account in the name of E designated by the Defendant.
B. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant concluded that the “I coffee shop” in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H 1st floor operated by the victim would be repaid in a lump sum on November 2016, if the Defendant borrowed the victim KRW 50,000,000,000, including the money previously lent.”
However, the defendant did not have operated the pawnpo, and was thought to use the funds borrowed from the victim to F in other places.
around April 28, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received each of the above accounts KRW 20 million from G bank account in the name of E designated by the Defendant, and around May 12, 2016, KRW 10 million from the above account.
C. On July 2016, the Defendant concluded that, in the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu J hotel for the second floor, the Defendant would enter into a contract with the Defendant to procure human resources to the Plaintiff at the mpinary site in L, along with the birth of K who operates a restaurant at the construction site. In relation to this contract, the Defendant borrowed insufficient funds in seven copies in relation to this contract, and would repay them at once on November 2016, along with the pawnpos.
However, the Defendant did not conclude a contract to procure human resources at the K and M-style site, and borrowed money from the victim.