1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. 원고의 주장 원고는 2014. 10. 14. 피고에게 원고가 소유하던 첼로 및 활 2개(이하 통틀어 ‘이 사건 악기’라 한다)를 판매하여 줄 것을 위탁하였는데, 피고가 위 위탁판매계약에도 불구하고 원고의 허락 없이 C에게 이 사건 악기를 넘겨주고 C이 이를 임의로 처분함으로써 원고에게 이 사건 악기 대금에 상당하는 손해가 발생하였으므로, 피고는 원고에게 손해배상으로 이 사건 악기 가액 27,000,000원 및 이에 대하여 원고가 이 사건 악기의 회수가 어렵다고 알게 된 2016. 10. 25.부터의 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.

2. The Plaintiff, along with D on October 14, 2014, visited the Defendant to sell the instant musical instruments and delivered the instant musical instruments to the Defendant. The Defendant prepared a consignment sales certificate and delivered it to the Plaintiff on the same day. The Defendant’s statement that “C cooperates with D to see the instant musical instruments” from D and delivered the instant musical instruments to C on December 2014. The fact that C arbitrarily delivered the instant musical instruments to its obligor on the pretext of debt security was either not in dispute between the parties, or is recognized by the purport of the entire pleadings and the testimony and arguments of the first instance witness D.

According to the above facts, the defendant concluded a delegation contract between the plaintiff and the plaintiff for the sale of the instant musical instrument and delivered it to C. However, the following circumstances, which can be revealed by the evidence as seen earlier, i.e., ① the plaintiff delivered the instant musical instrument to the defendant on October 14, 2014, together with C after being contacted with D and D. At the same time, the plaintiff attempted to entrust D with the sale of the instant musical instrument to the defendant at the same time.