Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment on December 14, 2012 with prison labor and on December 14, 2012 at Suwon District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 28, 2013.
The defendant and the victim C have become aware of the introduction of friendship in the Philippines.
1. On July 3, 200, around July 3, 2000, the defrauded made a false statement to the victim C who is in the Philippines at a Makao (hereinafter referred to as the “Makao”) to the effect that “I would immediately repay 600,000 won if I would like to transfer the amount to the victim C, who was in the Republic of Korea, because I would have to meet with the special awareness in Korea.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 600,000 won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.
2. Around July 5, 2000, around July 5, 2000, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “If the Defendant borrowed money with a cash of KRW 120 million to the Hong Kong Seoul Bank, it would be paid back by finding out the money to the Hong Kong Bank immediately following the following day.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained 2 million won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.
3. Around July 8, 2000, the fraud defendant made a false statement to the victim D, who is his or her father, from the Makao (hereinafter referred to as the "Makao") around July 8, 200, by phoneing the victim D, who is his or her father, to the airport."
However, the fact that C did not have any deficit attached to the airport, and therefore, C did not need one million won in order to unfold the airport.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 1 million won from the victim and acquired it by deceiving the victim.
4. Around October 26, 2000, the accused of fraud is below the Philippines around October 26, 200.