logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.05.12 2016고정341
업무방해
Text

All sentence imposed on the Defendants shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 26, 2014, the Defendants’ background and the Defendants’ status MM group announced that four affiliates of the petroleum chemical and defense industry, including N, will be sold to the KFG, and 1,300 workers belonging to NFG factories were placed against the sales decision and demanded the NFG branch N branch of the Democratic Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan MetalMMM (hereinafter referred to as “N branch”) around December 16, 2014 to continue to withdraw the sales decision on the part of the company by establishing the NFG branch of the NFG.

Nevertheless, around June 29, 2015, N would hold a general meeting of shareholders in P located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, to change its trade name to Q and decide on the agenda such as the appointment of a new director.

Accordingly, the N branch's labor union members decided to occupy the entrance of the general meeting of shareholders or to interfere with the general meeting of shareholders by participating in the general meeting of shareholders as a minor shareholder qualification, and approximately 600 union members moved from the window around 00:30 on June 29, 2015 to P by using buses from the window around 00:0 on June 29, 2015, and 05:30 on the same day, all the mast and work clothes were worn to the meeting of the general meeting of shareholders, and put together the P prior India

Defendant

A As a N branch auditor, Defendant J was a representative of Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, with other union members as a general union member, and was subject to the N branch resolution as above.

2. 범죄사실 피고인들은 다른 노조원 약 125명과 함께 같은 날 06:00 경부터 같은 날 06:20 경까지 위 P 후문 주차장 앞에서 어깨동무하거나 팔짱을 끼고 스크럼을 짜는 방법으로 P 사무총장인 R을 비롯하여 P 직원 및 주식회사 N 주주 등 20 여 명의 출입을 저지하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendants, by force, interfered with the general meeting of shareholders of the victim N and the duties of the victim PP employees.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (S), .

arrow