A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and C are members of the sexual organization that is active in the Japanese War, and D is the defendant's elementary school building.

The defendant was charged with fraud with money several times against D, and C was charged with aiding and abetting a part of the defendant's fraud, which made it easy for the defendant to commit a crime.

When the Defendant was present as a witness of a fraud aiding and abetting case against C, the Defendant had tried to make a false statement as if the Defendant was a single criminal defendant, despite the fact that he had acquired money through several times by finding D together with C, even though he had acquired money through several times.

Accordingly, at around October 26, 2017, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness for the fraud aiding and abetting case against the above court 2017 Gohap 57 Gohap at the court 214, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung District Court at around 14:30, 2017, and then, before the presiding judge of the first criminal court of the above court, the Defendant found D along with the Defendant (C) and found D with the Defendant of the above court.

“To answer the question”, and “ to find one time with the accused or with another person at one time” need to be entered.

“To answer the question “”.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. The Daejeon District Court asserted that: (a) a copy of the Daejeon District Court Decision 2017 High 57 High Gohap 1; (b) a witness examination protocol (A, D); and (c) a recording protocol; and (c) a trial protocol and a defendant examination protocol (C) of Daejeon District Court Decision 2017 High Gohap 57 support for the redness of Daejeon District Court Decision 2017 High Gohap 57.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., C, in the Hongsung support of the Daejeon District Court on Nov. 9, 2017, “D with the Defendant around Jan. 21, 2010, and it is believed that the Defendant was able to perform the Defendant’s work, and that the Defendant was well satisfing.

“.....”