beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 84,00,000 and the interest rate from April 9, 2014 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendants and C subcontracted the conversion and development of a mountainous district to E with respect to three parcels of land, namely, the wife population D, and three parcels of land in Permitted-si. The Defendants and C subcontracted to the Plaintiff for the reinforcement of the said construction (hereinafter “instant reinforcement construction”) at KRW 300 million.
B. In the name of the Plaintiff, Defendants, and C, and F, the separate sheet of payment (hereinafter “instant letter of payment”) was prepared with respect to the instant reinforced soil works.
(c)F is a person substantially operating Co., Ltd. E;
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. Interpretation of a juristic act is clearly confirming the objective meaning that the parties gave to the act of indicating it, and it does not include the phrase used in writing, but it is necessary to reasonably interpret the objective meaning given by the parties to the act of indicating it by the contents of the written document regardless of the parties’ internal intent (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 98Da31493, Nov. 10, 200). If the parties to a contract prepare the contents of a certain contract in writing as a disposal document, if the objective meaning of the text is clear, then the existence and contents of the expression of intent shall be recognized according to the language, barring any special circumstance. If the objective meaning of the text is not clearly clearly expressed, it shall be reasonably interpreted in accordance with logical and empirical rules, social common sense, and transaction norms so that the parties’ purpose and genuine intent to achieve the contract by the contract, transaction practices, etc. can conform to the social justice and equity ideology.
(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Da44368, Jun. 24, 2011). B.
The letter of payment in this case is “B and three others” in the name column, and the amount column.