logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.06.18 2020고정482
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an Internet computer game facility provider that provides Internet online games with the trade name of “C” from Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and the first floor.

No one shall provide the contents of game products for the distribution or use of the contents different from the contents of the game products rated by the Game Products Management Committee, or display or keep them for such purposes.

The above D game products rated by the Game Management Committee shall be made directly by customers, and the customers directly glick up in the game, and then purchase the bath and the game money and purchase it in the online.

Nevertheless, from the early January 2019 to June 25, 2019, the Defendant provided five computers to unspecified customers who installed five computers in the above C, and provided them with the said game products, and provided them with game money different from the contents of the game products rated in a way that allowed them to proceed with the said game by obtaining an unspecified number of participants and games in each channel already created in the game by means of adult certification, which was classified, rather than allowing them to proceed with the game, in a way that they received cash from an unspecified number of participants and games, rather than allowing them to proceed with the game, and then, the Defendant made a free release by using the ID, and intentionally lost the game money corresponding to the money received at the same time, by allowing them to acquire the game money, and by allowing them to proceed with the game.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification by the Game Management Committee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of D Game Prospectus), D Game description;

1. Investigation Report (Examination of the Violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry related to the Violation of Classification) applies 1.

arrow