1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, in Jeju, each point of which is indicated in the separate sheet No. 6 to 9, and 6, among the size of 423 square meters prior to E in order.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 21, 2001, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 423 square meters prior to E in Jeju-si (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. Defendant B completed each registration of ownership transfer on March 27, 2008 with respect to the F. 476 square meters on March 21, 2008 with respect to the land of this case, which is adjacent to the land of this case, on March 21, 2008, with respect to the 99 square meters in a warehouse of one-story of the land of this case (hereinafter “the building of this case”). Defendant B committed a crime with respect to the part (B) in the ship (hereinafter “the land of this case No. 1”) which connects each point of 6 through 9, and 6 of the attached drawings in sequence among the land of this case.

C. The Defendant C is the owner of a wood farm 265 square meters above H, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, G-si, a wood farm 265 square meters above the 39.67 square meters above the 26.45 square meters above the 26.45 square meters above the gu, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, which is adjacent to the instant land (hereinafter “instant building 2”). Defendant D is a person who is currently occupying the instant building by leasing the instant building 2 from Defendant C. The instant building is a person who is currently occupying the instant building by leasing it from Defendant C. The instant building 2 is a person who commits a crime of KRW 39 square meters in the inside (a) of the instant land, which is linked in sequence to each of the items indicated in the annexed drawings 1 through 5 and 1 (hereinafter “instant

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 4 (including each number), the result of a request for surveying and appraisal to the Jeju branch office of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination as to claims against the Defendants

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the owner of the land in dispute Nos. 1 and 2 of this case, who is entitled to claim the removal of disturbance based on ownership, and Defendant B is obligated to remove the part on the ground of the land in dispute No. 1 of this case among the buildings No. 1 of this case and deliver the land in dispute No. 1 of this case. Defendant C removes the part on the ground of the building No. 2 of this case among the buildings in dispute No. 2 of this case, and the second dispute of this case.