1. On March 14, 2013, the Defendant’s disposition to exclude the Plaintiff from the subject of the private taxi transport business license is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff, who served as a taxi driver in the Geumsung Corporation Limited Partnership Company from January 2, 2002, applied for a personal taxi transportation business license to the Defendant.

B. Upon examining the Plaintiff’s driving experience, the Defendant informed the Plaintiff on March 14, 2013, on the ground that the Plaintiff did not constitute “the driver who driven a taxi due to an accident without fault for at least 10 years,” which is a first-order person subject to the license for private taxi transport business, on the ground that he/she did not constitute “the driver who faithfully performed his/her duty of care,” as a result of the Plaintiff’s negligence on March 2, 2010.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 6, and 8 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the Plaintiff’s unilateral negligence when the Plaintiff was faced with the Plaintiff’s taxi that was normally driven by the Plaintiff while driving the road without permission. As such, the Plaintiff’s assertion met the requirements of the Plaintiff’s non-accidented taxi driving experience of at least 10 years (one year and 11 months of non-accident driving period, and one year additional commendation of the Minister of Public Administration and Security).

The disposition of this case on the ground that it did not meet the above requirements is unlawful.

B. The facts of recognition (1) Around 16:30 on March 2, 2010, the Plaintiff was driving a B taxi and driving a road of one lane in front of the bottled store distance located in the eternal path, from the direction of the running direction to the head of Silsan, and the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) who has been laid on his/her own roadway from the right side of the driving direction to the front part of the Plaintiff’s driving vehicle.