1. On July 1, 2013, the Defendant’s disposition not to grant a new license to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 1, 2013, the Defendant publicly announced the recruitment of persons eligible for a new taxi transport business license in 2013 pursuant to the “Rules on the Handling of Personal Taxi Transport Business License (hereinafter “instant Provisions”) established by the Passenger Transport Service Act, the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (hereinafter “instant provisions”). The number of licensed persons: The first order of priority in issuing seven personal taxi licenses:

(a) A person who has driven a taxi without fault for at least ten years as of the date of public announcement of an application for a license and has served in a taxi company within his/her jurisdiction for at least seven years;

(b) A non-accident driver for at least five years (a non-accident driver for at least 12 years as a person who has served for at least 15 years as an individual taxi driver) as a person who has served in a taxi company in the jurisdiction as of the date an application for a license is published;

(c) Persons who drive a taxi due to an accident for not less than eight years (hereinafter referred to as "taxison");

(a) A person who has driven a taxi due to a non-accident for at least seven years and has served in a taxi company within his/her jurisdiction for at least three years;

(b) Any person who has been employed by any third person and drives a motor vehicle for business without a accident for at least 11 years, who has driven a motor vehicle for self-employed business without a accident for at least 16 years, and who has obtained a certificate of annual display for a non-accident for at least 10 years from the

(c) Any person who has driven a government-managed vehicle due to an accident for not less than 16 years (hereinafter referred to as "accident");

B. Around May 2013, the Plaintiff applied for a new personal taxi transportation business license to the Defendant.

C. In calculating the Plaintiff’s non-accidented driving experience, the Defendant calculated the Plaintiff’s calculation by excluding the experience of driving a non-tax vehicle at the place of work indicated below, and the period of personal taxi driving as agent, the Defendant issued a disposition of non-authorization of a new taxi transport business license against the Plaintiff on July 1, 2013 (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Work period;