beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.
However, as to the Defendants, each objection is made against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants, without a construction business license, conspired to receive money from the victim D who is operating C to use the money for security, etc., on the ground that they were aware of the fact that they were well aware of the fact that they had access to the victims D who are operating C and are going to perform the construction work as a permanent dam construction project.
On March 6, 2012, at a F cafeteria located under E at a permanent city on permanent residence on March 6, 2012, the Defendants concluded that “The Defendant well-known the site manager of the Hanyang Construction, a subcontractor, to be a subcontractor for the construction of the Young River Construction. B has resolved land compensation for H as an assistant officer of all members G of the National Assembly. In other words, us would have to obtain a subcontract for part of the construction of the new road.”
However, the Defendants did not have any authority to select a subcontractor, and there was no promise to allow the Defendants to receive a subcontract for a part of the construction work. The Defendants did not know about the person related to the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the construction work of the permanent residence of the H and the construction work of the permanent residence of the H and did not have any intent or ability to allow the complainant to obtain a subcontract for a part of the construction work as the theory of the permanent residence of the construction work.
The Defendants received 24 million won from the victim to June 25, 2012 at the time as indicated in the list of crimes, including the receipt of one check from one million won in the face of the victim.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police statement made to D, I, and H;
1. A copy of the agricultural bank deposit passbook, a copy of each loan certificate, respectively.