logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고단1440
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principals did not have the intent or ability to provide a construction subcontract even if they received money in return for a construction subcontract. Defendant B intended to give a subcontract in the name of H(State) and I(State), a construction company, and introduced Defendant A to receive a subcontract, and Defendant A conspired to receive money from the victim, knowing that Defendant B did not have the ability to provide a construction subcontract.

Defendant

B around July 20, 2012, Defendant A received money from a new office and an officetel as a security deposit to a person who is awarded a subcontract for construction work because he received more than KRW 100 billion construction from the J in Gyeongcheon-do and Kimchi factory construction in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-do. Defendant A, around July 23, 2012, ordered Defendant A to receive a subcontract for construction work. Defendant A, at the I’s office located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, J, and to receive a subcontract for construction work of Kimchi factory located in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, and to receive a subcontract for construction work of Kimchi factory construction in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-do. In order to pay an advance payment of KRW 800,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000.

However, the facts indicate that Defendant B was the representative of Defendant B and the State are merely a company with documents that have almost little records of construction work, and that Defendant B did not have the intent or ability to give a subcontract for the said construction because it did not have the ability to purchase land for the said construction work or obtain a loan from a financial institution. Even if Defendant B knew of the circumstances of Defendant B, Defendant A did not have the intent or ability to give a subcontract for the said construction to the victim even if he received money from the victim

The Defendants conspired with each other.

arrow