The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles are unilaterally made from the victim, and there was no fact that the victim flabeded with flab, and even if the defendant injured the victim, this constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act by passive resistance to avoid unilateral assault by the victim, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant, despite the fact that it constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (700,000 won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the right holder of a hole around C’s residence, and the Defendant used the said hole as a garden around 00:40 on May 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol and resisting the victim’s house; (b) demanded the victim not to allow the use of the hole; and (c) caused the victim’s injury, such as the 5-day duplic of the right-hand dup, which requires the victim’s treatment for about five weeks, by taking the duplic around the duplic.

3. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by compiling the evidence as indicated in its judgment.

4. Judgment of the court below

가. 원심에서 적법하게 채택ㆍ조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 피해자와 목격자 E은 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관하여 피고인과 피해자가 서로 멱살을 잡고 넘어져 도로 바닥을 뒹굴고 있었다고 진술하는데, 위 진술의 신빙성을 배척할 만한 별다른 사정이 엿보이지 않는 점, 피해자는 이 사건으로 인하여 약 5주간의 치료를 요하는 우측 제5수지 망치지, 우견관절부, 경추부, 좌완관절부에 다발성 염좌를 입은 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 넘어뜨리는 등의 방법으로...