A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2015, at around 07:00, the Defendant: (a) on the road in front of the 12’s “Sari Middle School,” a 84-ro 84, Nam-gu, Incheon, Seoul, the center of U.S., the Defendant: (b) considered the Defendant’s franchise that the Defendant would leave the her husband; and (c) considered the victim D, who was doubtful of the internal combustion relationship between the Defendant and her husband, and (d) sent the said car to the Defendant’s top of the car operation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant continued the said car at a 10-meter price as it is, and the damaged person suffered injury in need of medical treatment for about 3 weeks, such as brain-dead sugar, sprink, sprink, sprink, sprink, sprinke salt, dyspology, etc., left from the spacker.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that he/she was driving a motor vehicle to avoid the scene at the time and did not inflict any injury on the victim using the motor vehicle.

In full view of the legal statements of the victim, witness D and E, the victim discovered that the victim was the husband of the victim at the time of the accident so that he would stop the front of the defendant's vehicle that the victim tried to see the defendant's vehicle. The defendant intending to avoid this accident was attached to the chief driver of the defendant's vehicle. Nevertheless, the defendant continued to run the motor vehicle, and the defendant continued to run the motor vehicle, and the defendant got a large voice, but the defendant did not stop the motor vehicle, and the victim was able to see the fact that he was faced with the vehicle.

In light of these facts, the defendant can be recognized that the defendant sustained injury to the victim even though he sufficiently recognizes the fact that the victim was able to have his own her own wheeler.