logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.01.28 2015노2627
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 24, 2015, the summary of the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts) stated that the Defendant did not drink the alcohol at the time of making it to Schlages adjacent to the gas station G, and reported it to the police by assault from this Chapter while drinking the alcohol at that time, and reported it to the police. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of receiving the request for the measurement of drinking alcohol. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of receiving the request for the measurement of drinking alcohol by informing the Defendant, who was the president of the G gas station, and I, the president of the G gas station, who was dissatisfied with the Defendant, provided the Defendant with false information that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of receiving the request for the measurement of drinking alcohol.

have reasonable grounds to determine that there is a reasonable

There was no recognized situation.

2. The lower court determined as follows based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court: (i) the Defendant stated at an investigative agency that he dices alcohol at G around 19:30 on the day of the instant case; (ii) the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by G around G gas station on the day of the instant case; (iii) according to the Silve’s (CCTV) film around G gas station on February 24, 2015; (iv) around G gas station around 20:35 on February 24, 2015, the Defendant parked and parked at one car cost; and (v) the Plaintiff fell from G gas station; and (v) on the same day, up to two persons met each other outside of Schlage around G gas at around 20:49 on the same day. Since the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the Defendant, it was difficult for the Defendant to have arrived at the above Schlage at the point of time except for the Defendant’s vehicle.

M, N,O, and P refused to put the defendant into Skina play after entering Skis, and this Chapter refused that the defendant should not drink the drinking, after about 10 minutes of the telephone conversations with police officers, and the O went out of the defendant.

arrow