1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is mainly a manufacturer of electronic parts of approximately 300 workers who produce and sell PE-related products. The Plaintiff is a person who entered the Defendant Co., Ltd on March 2012 and worked in the purchasing team.

B. Around November 2011, Defendant B entered the Defendant Company and served as the deputy head of the package of the purchase team. On August 31, 2017, Defendant B resigned from the Defendant Company, and was in the Plaintiff’s direct superior position at the time of the Defendant Company’s employment.

C. From April 2016, the Plaintiff received mental diagnosis and treatment due to symptoms, such as depression, inorganic history, labor force, depression, apprehension, apprehension, depression, and inhuman relations difficulties. Considering that the cause of the above symptoms is a repetitive sexual indecent act committed in the workplace, the Plaintiff was consulted on the legal measures, etc. for sexual indecent act at the Korea Sexual Violence Counseling Center, an incorporated association, around May 2, 2016, and thereafter filed a complaint against D, E, and Defendant B on suspicion of indecent act by occupational force.

On January 25, 2017, the prosecutor issued a non-prosecution disposition with respect to the accusation case in question, and among them, the details of the suspicion and the prosecutor’s disposition are as follows:

On May 2015, Defendant B’s disposition of the fact-finding investigation of the name of the defendant B at around 23:00 to 24:00, the Plaintiff’s house with the mind that the Plaintiff was drunk after drinking at the end of May 2013, and the Plaintiff’s joint house with the mind that each of the Plaintiff’s joints and joints and joints had no right to prosecute three to four chests (the complaint period Do) (the complaint period Do) and the Defendant Company’s fee stated that “I want to look at the Plaintiff’s chest at the Plaintiff’s chest at the time of meeting, I want to report it once and once,” thereby openly impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation (founded grounds for recognition), without dispute, the purport of the entire arguments, and the purport of each of the evidence, evidence Nos. 4, 8, 11, 12, 1, 3, and 3.

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant B met with the employer around May 2015.