logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.06.29 2018구합890
부작위위법확인 등
Text

1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

In administrative litigation, the purport and cause of the claim shall be specified in the subject matter of lawsuit and the scope of the trial of the court, and shall be specified in detail so that the contents and scope of the claim can be clearly identified in the complaint in order to determine whether the period for filing the lawsuit is observed and whether the claim is appropriate

However, the written complaint submitted by the Plaintiff cannot specify the Plaintiff’s purport of claim and the cause of claim, and this is also the same even if the written amendment submitted by the Plaintiff according to the order of correction of this

Therefore, the lawsuit of this case is inappropriate because the purport of the claim is not specified, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, without holding any pleadings pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 219

arrow