logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.04.06 2018구합1916
건강보험료 부과처분 취소 등
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The purpose of the claim in the administrative litigation shall be to specify the subject matter of the lawsuit and the scope of the trial of the court, and to specify the necessary matters in the complaint in order to confirm whether the period for filing the lawsuit complies with, and to specify the contents and scope thereof clearly

However, even if the written complaint and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) are comprehensive, the content of the disposition subject to the Plaintiff’s revocation or invalidation confirmation cannot be specified, and this is also the same even if the correction submitted by the Plaintiff according to the order of correction of this court.

Therefore, the lawsuit of this case is inappropriate because the purport of the claim is not specified, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, without holding any pleadings pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 219

arrow