1. The plaintiff and the defendant B are the sloping roof of D-ground reinforced concrete structure in Gyeongyang-si, Gyeongyang-nam.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant North Korean Agricultural Cooperatives

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession: Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act;

2. Determination as to claims against Defendant B and C

A. On April 4, 2014, the Plaintiff and Defendant B owned on April 4, 2014 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) are 124 square meters in place of D-ground reinforced concrete structure, sloping roof, one story, one story, and 9.75 square meters in place of reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

3) As to the instant lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

2) As to the instant real estate between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, the Plaintiff entered into a restaurant in the name of “E”. 2) As to the instant real estate, the Plaintiff and Defendant B entered into a separate lease agreement and the separate lease agreement.

3) Defendant B sold the instant real estate to Defendant C, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 11, 2014, and Defendant C submitted the attached lease agreement to Nonindicted Agricultural Cooperative in setting up a collateral security right to the instant real estate in order to secure F’s obligation to Defendant Busan Agricultural Cooperative. [Grounds for recognition] Party B1 through 3 (each entry and the purport of the entire pleadings including a serial number)

B. Party 1’s assertion that the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with Defendant B by setting the lease deposit of KRW 30,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,000,000, and premium of KRW 30,000,000, as in the attached lease contract as in the attached lease contract. However, Defendant B’s mother formed and entered into the attached lease contract at the request of Defendant B, and used the land adjacent to the instant real estate owned by Defendant B as a parking lot, and paid KRW 50,000,000 as the monthly rent of KRW 1,00,000, in addition to the rent of KRW 1,000,000, and Defendant B would prevent the entry of the vehicle by piling up the wall on the said empty lot. However, Defendant B and Defendant C would only pay KRW 1,00,000 monthly rent from November 2014.