A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Ulsan District Court to a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 4 million from the Ulsan District Court on September 7, 201 to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing siren car.

On October 2, 2019, at approximately 22:30, the Defendant moved the intersection of the two king distance from the side of the industrial tower to the sloping distance from the side of the industrial tower at a sloping speed.

At the time, there is a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the steering system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was driven by the victim C (year 54) who was under the right-hand side of the Defendant’s front section of the D G70 that was driven by the victim C (year 54) who was under the right-hand side from the left-hand side of the vehicle.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, such as spawn spawn, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a rocketing motor vehicle within a four km radius from the two king roads in front of the mutual influent restaurant in Ulsan-gu, Nam-gu to the two king roads located in the same Gu, under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.057% of the above temporary light alcohol level.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Sluice survey report, related photographs, and photographs to cut a black stuff;

1. Report on the results of the control of drinking driving and the statement on the state of drinking drivers;