logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.12.22 2016나3473
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following parts to the 5th and 18th of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Additional Part] According to Gap evidence No. 2 (Real Estate Lease Contract), it is recognized that the defendant agreed to keep all goods necessary for the business in the store when the business is terminated in the future between the plaintiff and the plaintiff at the time of concluding the contract of this case. Thus, the defendant's assertion seeking compensation equivalent to the purchase price of the goods at the house is without merit even in this respect.

2. If so, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow