logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.10 2016나107958
건물명도
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for the addition of the judgment on the Defendants’ assertion added by the court of first instance to the fifth seventh (7th) of the judgment of the court of first instance, and as such, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with

[Supplementary part] The defendants were promised to refund the expenses for the facilities installed by the defendants from the plaintiff for the first time. Thus, the plaintiff's obligation to reimburse the expenses for the defendants, the obligation to deliver the building of this case, and the obligation to leave the building of this case in this case by the defendant Eul are related to the simultaneous performance. However, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the same merely with the entries of the evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, according to the entries of the evidence No. 4, it is recognized that the defendant agreed to install the facilities, equipment, etc. at the expense of the defendant, and not to claim all the expenses and rights for the facilities at the time of obtaining the permission for use of the building of this case from the plaintiff.

Therefore, this part of the defendants' assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.

arrow