1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 20, 2010, the Plaintiff was enrolled in B Co., Ltd. and worked at C Hospital cafeterias located in the north-si, Mapo-si, in which the said company had been operated from that time, and the Plaintiff was prevented from running the vegetable electric vehicle that became inside the Dong-dong due to the bar trouble among the Do that moved around August 20, 2012.

More than anything else, there was an accident that faces side interest such as the maternity of the jury dong and the side interest.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

After the accident of this case, the Plaintiff obtained approval for medical care from the Defendant, and received medical care until August 31, 2013.

C. After that, on February 15, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an additional medical care and an application for an additional injury or disease with respect to the Defendant for a pain after spine surgery (FBS). However, on February 23, 2016, the Defendant received a decision on the additional medical care and the non-approval of the additional injury or disease due to the reason that “The Plaintiff’s opinion was examined based on the Plaintiff’s note of intention, medical record, radiation photograph, etc., and as a result of deliberation on the basis of the Plaintiff’s opinion, medical record, radiation photograph, etc., which was implemented on December 29, 2015. However, there was no medical causal relationship between the period approval and the period approval, and there was no medical causal relationship between the medical care and the additional injury or disease.”

After the plaintiff filed an administrative lawsuit against this, the part of the lawsuit on the decision of non-approval for the additional medical care was withdrawn, and the plaintiff winning judgment was finally affirmed on the decision of non-approval for the additional

(Seoul Administrative Court 2016Gudan12496). D.

On March 8, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury or disease with respect to u pathy. However, on March 28, 2017, the Plaintiff received a decision on non-approval of additional injury or disease from the Defendant on the ground that “the cause of the occurrence of the additional injury or the causal link with the existing injury or disease, etc.” was not verified.

The plaintiff appealed against this and filed an administrative litigation, and the judgment of winning the plaintiff became final and conclusive.

(Seoul Administrative Court 2017Gudan63903). e.