1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 1, 2014, the Plaintiff was a worker belonging to the Plaintiff Company B, who was at the time of the replacement of scrap around 16:45 on December 1, 2014, and was faced with the left-hand shoulder by lowering the compacter floor.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiff received medical care approval from the Defendant, and received medical care from the Defendant, from December 2, 2014 to March 31, 2015, as the instant accident occurred.

B. On March 5, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at C Hospital on the top of the field to check (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”) and received the check-up and the check-up and the check-up and check-up and the check-up and check-up and check-up and the upper control at the hospital on April 9, 2015.

C. On April 17, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for additional medical care and additional injury to the instant injury and disease. However, on May 29, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition of additional medical care and non-approval of additional injury and disease on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the injury and disease in the instant injury and the circumstance of the accident.

On June 19, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant for the instant injury and disease. However, on August 17, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the Plaintiff’s work.

E. On August 1, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care and additional injury to the Defendant for the instant injury and disease. However, the Defendant rendered additional medical care and additional injury and disease non-approval (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it was identical to the previous application on August 23, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 9, Eul evidence 1 through 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that a proximate causal relation is recognized between the existing injury or disease or the accident of this case.