logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.10.10 2014노1232
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the crime of this case committed by the defendant while driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.131% without a driver's license while neglecting his/her duty to breath in the front direction of the vehicle running by the defendant, resulting in the victim C (hereinafter "victim") who stops in the signal atmosphere in the front direction of the vehicle running by the defendant, with the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the victim, and the case is not less than three times, and there are records of punishment for driving under the influence of alcohol and without a license of the driver's license of the driver's license of the defendant (two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment, two years of probation, one hundred and twenty hours of community service order, and forty hours of order of compliance driving instruction of the driver'

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the prosecutor of the judgment, the following circumstances are considered: (a) the accused is led to confession and reflect; (b) the accused is not subject to punishment for the accused; (c) the Defendant’s punishment force for driving without a license without a license is all past 2010; and (d) the Defendant does not repeat again; and (c) the Defendant may expect the effect of recidivism through probation, community service and lecture order issued by the court below while issuing a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor; (d) other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s character, conduct and environment; (e) the background and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed unfair, and thus, the prosecutor’s allegation above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow