The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is as follows: in light of the following facts: (a) the instant crime was committed by the Defendant’s negligence by driving the vehicle without the front line and driving the vehicle at the front direction of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “victim”) and the Defendant’s negligence, thereby causing the victim’s cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the 1998.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the public prosecutor, the following circumstances are considered: (a) even if the Defendant took into account the circumstances alleged by the public prosecutor of the judgment, the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided and reflected; (b) the degree of damage caused by the instant traffic accident is not limited; (c) the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance; (d) the Defendant does not have the same penal power except for the power as seen earlier; and (e) the lower court determined that the effect of recidivism can be realized through probation, community service order, and lecture order issued by the Defendant while issuing a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor; and (e) other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s character, conduct and environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) circumstances after the crime, etc.,

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.