logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.04.12 2017고정416
사기미수
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Some of the facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not interfere with guaranteeing the defendants' right of defense.

Defendant

A entered into an automobile insurance contract for the amount of automobile to Samsung T&T Co., Ltd. with the limited special agreement that is at least 35 years of age from December 4, 2015 to December 4, 2016, which is at least 35 years of age, and Defendant B is the male-child district of Defendant A.

Defendant

B around September 2, 2016, around 23:10, around 162 km at the right-hand rest in the border line 162 km away from the border road, the Dpool load was caused by a shock absorption tank protection wall installed on the right-hand side while driving in Seoul in the direction of Seoul, but only Defendant A was asked to accept the insurance after the occurrence of the said traffic accident, and Defendant A was driving.

After that, around 02:15 on September 3, 2016, Defendant A called the call at the call center for Samsung T&T disaster insurance, and caused an accident by getting off the direction of Seoul on September 3, 2016, she around 01:10 on the road in the city of Pacific-gun, Pacific-gun, Pacific-do, Pacific-do, Pacific-do, and the driver himself/herself at the time of the accident.

“The receipt of an accident” was made.

The employees of the victim Samsung T&T Co., Ltd. who believe that this is true shall pay 128,736,270 won for repair of the above vehicle and 146,923,130 won for repair of the above vehicle, such as 18,186,860 won for shock tank protection, and 18,186,860 won for the shock tank, but did not pay the insurance money because the insurance fraud is doubtful through the reported person dispatched to the scene.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to acquire property benefits, but attempted to commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A petition, written confirmation of an accident, written statement on accident circumstances, and written waiver of a claim for the payment of insurance proceeds;

1. Written estimate and data from the results of damage adjustment;

1. The receipt of an accident, the list of contracts, the photographic data of the vehicle involved;

arrow