The appeal by the prosecutor is dismissed.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that the defendant had the intention to inflict bodily injury on bus passengers by having D, who had driven a bus which is a vehicle after the rapid stop by intentionally taking the buck of one ton truck that he had driven by the defendant, and caused D, who had driven a vehicle after the rapid stop. In addition, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

Judgment

The court below found the defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case as part of the defendant's lag driving.

Then, according to the video recorded in the situation at the time of this case, the defendant's driver's truck entered the three-lane road by excessivelypassing it, and the body of the vehicle was faced with right and right, but it was found that there was a harsh phenomenon that the speed of the bus was reduced when the bus was changed, and that there was no evidence to find the defendant not guilty of the charge on the ground that there was no other evidence to prove that there was a change in the part of the defendant's bus to the effect that "the driver's truck did not recognize how near the bus was driven by the driver's vehicle at the time."

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment by closely comparing the reasoning of the lower judgment with the record, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is just, and it is not recognized that the prosecutor erred by mistake of facts as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

The Prosecutor’s Appeal is the conclusion.