logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.08.29 2016고단1113
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 8, 2016, at the main point of “D” located in Busan Shipping Daegu C and 2, the Defendant: (a) committed a dispute with E, the president of the said main point; (b) the victim F (47 years of age), “I Ha Ha Ha L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L

2. Around 22:40 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) arrested the police officer of the above police box, who was called out after receiving a report, to the chief of the police box belonging to Busan Shipping Daegu G; (b) refused to leave the police box before the above police box; (c) provided a bath to the police officer of the said police box (55 years old); and (d) spits down spits, etc. on his chest on his chests.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a police officer, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of flagrant offenders by the above J.

3. Around 22:56 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) received the wall surface of the above police box from the Defendant on the ground that it was unsatisfyed even after entering the police box; and (b) took the wall surface of the above police box several times, and 6:60,000 won of the wall surface of the above police box was auxiliary to ensure that the police officer continued to cover the wall to protect the Defendant’s head; and (c) caused the police officer to unsatisfy the repair and unsatisfying of the police fitness in the same way.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to J and I;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act chosen to impose an injury;

arrow