1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant A, C, and E are the amount corresponding to each recognized penalty stated in the separate sheet, and each of them.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that sells goods at a distribution store at the same time by delivering sales information such as items, prices, and quantities to a central computer to process various business affairs such as settlement and sales management and analyze data. The Plaintiff constitutes an independent communications network by lending a line of value-added network (VN, Vald Network, telecommunications business operator from a telecommunications business operator, which is a value-added telecommunications network connected with the license, and constitutes a new communications network composed of a new communications network with a credit card in addition to the communications service, the Plaintiff entered into an agency contract with the Knet (hereinafter referred to as “Knet”) company (hereinafter referred to as “Knet”), which is a company that provides services such as approval of credit card transactions, credit sales proceeds, automatic transfer, etc., while mediating credit card companies and franchise stores.

B. The Plaintiff agreed to supply a license to individual stores with T (hereinafter “T”) that is an external franchise business entity, and accordingly, agreed to supply a license to each of the Defendants, who are the owners of individual stores in each of the Defendant’s corresponding to the attached penalty details, and the Plaintiff, for three years, supplied the bareboat system, bareboat device, peripheral devices, etc., and used only the bareboat service designated by the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the use of the bareboat (hereinafter “each of the instant user agreements”) with the intent to support a certain amount of money. The support group for each individual store, the preference subsidy, and the number of agreed terms are as follows.

C. The Plaintiff’s advance discount on the condition that the agreed number of occasions should be fulfilled for the three-year period as above. If the Defendants unilaterally terminate each of the instant utilization agreements prior to the agreed period, the Plaintiff’s unilateral termination of the agreement.