logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.22 2018가합508514
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 78,878,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 10, 2018 to November 22, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff refers to all services rendered by a value-added network provider (referring to a person registered with the Financial Services Commission in accordance with the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act for value-added network, such as credit cards, as defined in Article 2 subparag. 8-3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act), including credit card companies and credit sales approval, and automatic transfer of credit sales payments, provided by a value-added network provider (referring to a person registered with the Financial Services Commission in accordance with the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act for value-added network, as defined in Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act). The value-added network provider providing a credit card provider’s agent for a value-added network provider that provides a credit card device, POS equipment POS equipment, combined with the function of a

A company that installs and manages CCTV, etc. is a company.

The defendant operates a store directly with the trade name "North village only", or concludes a franchise agreement with a franchisee and allows the franchisee to operate the franchise store with the trade name above.

B. On March 24, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a service contract to provide VN services exclusively to the Defendant’s direct store or franchise store store (hereinafter “Defendant store”).

In addition, on November 5, 2014 and March 3, 2017, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract to partially modify the terms of the above service contract.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on March 3, 2017. Of the instant contract, the content relevant to the instant case is as follows.

Article 3 [Period of Contract] 1] The term of this contract is from November 5, 2014 to 36 months. 2) The Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “B”) did not give written notice of their intent to terminate or modify this contract 30 days prior to the expiration of the term of contract.

arrow