Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 11:00 on March 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) made a resolution to hold a senior citizen center meeting and suspend the membership of the senior citizen center E, a member of the meeting; (b) forged a private document in the name of F with regard to the certification of facts, stating at will the name and seal of F who did not attend the meeting in the process of signing and sealing the minutes from the members present at the meeting.

B. There is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant arbitrarily recorded F’s name in the minutes as stated in the facts charged (the F’s name is stated in the minutes for senior citizens, but no seal is affixed).

F There is only a CD with the content of June 26, 2018, written statement of June 2018, written statement of June 26, 2018, written investigation report of the same content (report on the recording of telephone conversations by a witness) and written statement of the above telephone conversation, in which the F did not attend the meeting of the E member qualification suspension conducted by the senior citizen center on March 24, 2018, and signed the minutes.

F When a police officer visits a senior citizen center to the meeting minutes on June 10, 2018 and confirms whether it was signed and sealed by the senior citizen center members, the F voluntarily states that he/she had signed and sealed the meeting minutes or signed the meeting minutes with his/her consent, and it is not consistent with the F’s statement. In addition, even if the F’s statement is based on F’s statement, the NF’s arbitrary statement of F’s name in the meeting minutes can be acknowledged, and there is no evidence that the Defendant committed such act.

2. Defendant B

A. On January 2018, the Defendant, in the facts charged, was openly false at the senior citizen center located in G in G, G, and other members of the senior citizen center in G, etc., following the victim E, the Defendant’s participation in the crime was “hys, maths, and king. The Do senior citizens, who were the senior citizens of the Do senior citizens, was the Do senior citizens, and was the senior citizens of the Do senior citizens.”