The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant’s distribution of printed materials is all true, and the Defendant acted for the public interest for apartment residents, and its illegality is dismissed.

2. The Defendant also asserted the same purport in the lower court, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the grounds of the circumstances indicated in its reasoning.

In light of the following circumstances established by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the above determination by the court below is just and acceptable, and there are errors in its conclusion.

subsection (b) of this section.

A. Of the instant inducements, with respect to the part of “a person who commits an act of flabing, such as having 100,000 won or more per month drinking at food for food expenses,” the victim, while conducting an extraordinary session for one year at an investigative agency, dices alcohol once a bbbbbbing.

The scope of use of money in the management rules is set and 100,000 won is imposed according to the regulations.

“On the other hand,” the Defendant stated that the Defendant “ does not have to confirm” (Evidence No. 1, Title 29).

After the completion of the Council meeting, we think that we think that we would drink, not directly confirm it.

“After making a false statement (Evidence No. 2, No. 36 of the evidence record) the Defendant had not undergone a fact-finding verification on this part.

B. As to the instant printed matter, the part that “the injured person performed a funeral service in a sussia and went to a prison” among the printed matter of this case, the victim did not have any sussia nor had it go to a funeral service in a entertainment room in an investigative agency.

On the other hand, the Defendant stated that “On the other hand, the Defendant did not look at the content that the victimized person was the head of the entertainment office in Russia and that he was satisfing.”

It reported the printed matter prepared by another person at that match, and it thought that it was more.

"............" (Evidence Nos. 2, 37, 38) and this part is objective.