The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant, by misapprehending the legal principles, temporarily stopped a truck at the right side of the road after passing through the intersection after the instant accident occurred, examined the situation of the accident, and left the accident site of this case. Considering the fact that the instant accident does not have products away from the accident site and the victim did not have any injury, the Defendant was obligated to take necessary measures when the instant accident occurred.

It is difficult to see it.

B. The sentence that the court below sentenced the defendant to the sentencing unfair is too unreasonable (2,000,000 won).

2. Determination

A. We examine the misunderstanding of facts and legal principles as to the assertion of mistake and error. Then, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below: ① the accident of this case occurred at the wind that the defendant tried to change the lane rapidly, and the defendant also stated that "the vehicle was aware of collision" at the time of the first investigation conducted by the police (No. 35, No. 36, No. 40, No. 27 of the evidence record of the public trial record), ② the defendant violated the signal while passing through the intersection even after the signal was changed to red light after the accident of this case (Evidence No. 2, No. 53 of the evidence record of the public trial). ③ The defendant temporarily stopped at the edge of the road and stated that the defendant was not the victim's statement at the point where the victim was waiting for 1 to 2 minutes after checking the condition of his truck and the situation of the accident after the point where the accident occurred.