Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who runs precious metal business with the trade name of “C” in Busan Shipping Daegu B. A.

At around 14:00 on August 2, 2013, the Defendant purchased one of the 18K Jjin-in-Grounds equivalent to KRW 1,200,00 in the market price owned by E, which was stolen by the previous D from D from D.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the sales business of precious metals, has a duty of care to ensure that he/she does not purchase stolen goods only by checking the seller's status, details of acquisition of goods, sales motive, etc. and recording them in the book, and at the same time he/she has a duty of care to ensure that he/she does not purchase stolen goods

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care and purchased the above half of KRW 230,00.

B. At around 14:00 on December 7, 2013, the Defendant purchased 120,000 won, without violating the duty of due care, the Defendant purchased 120,000 won the above half-yearly land, after verifying the seller’s status, the process of acquiring the goods, the sales motive, etc., and entering the seller’s status, the details of acquiring the goods, the sales motive, etc. in the account book.

C. At around 15:00 on February 3, 2014, the Defendant purchased even 18K E’s market price in the market price that was stolen by the former D from D, and confirmed the seller’s status, the process of acquiring goods, the sales motive, etc., and entered the seller’s name, the details of acquisition of goods, the sales motive, etc. in the account book, and subsequently, purchased the said 18K E amounting to 250,000, with the Defendant breached the duty of due care and breached the duty of care to properly look at whether the possessor suitable for the status and the reasonable price according to the transaction

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired stolen stolen goods from D on three occasions without neglecting the above duty of care, and acquired stolen goods by negligence in the course of business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police of D. D.