A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On September 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for the crime of embezzlement at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 26, 2012.

[2] On December 1, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around 2009, at a coffee shop located in Bupyeong-si, the victim C and the victim D (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”); and (b) made a contract with the victim C and the victim for supply with a high-quality and high-profit product; and (c) entered into a supply contract with a modern automobile and a car.

and show the contract, “30,000,000 won for the purchase of large equipment necessary to develop the project,” shall be repaid in the amount of 60,000,000 won per month on the face of the investment, and shall be distributed in the amount of 20,000,000 won for each month’s profit, and shall be paid 50% of the shares of E.

If the principal is not repaid within six months, seven machinery installed in corporation E will be transferred as security.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant could not exceed 50% of the shares of the victims due to civil action that occurred in the process of water supply, as well as modern vehicles or automatic vehicles.

In addition, there was no intention to provide 7 machinery units installed in Korea Co., Ltd. as collateral for transfer, such as not being well informed of the identification number.

Moreover, the defendant was under an economic difficulty to be registered as a bad credit holder at the time, and even if he received an investment from the victims as the purchase price for machinery, it was thought that only a part of it was used for the purchase of machinery and for personal purposes such as repayment of the remaining debts, and there was no intention or ability to pay the investment principle to

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victims as above and deceiving them to make investments from the victims, 140,000,000 won around May 6, 2010, and the same year.

5.14.Woman 22,000,000