The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (five years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant, who habitually intrudes on a restaurant operated by the victims, steals things, and discovered the stolen objects, causing each injury in consideration of the victims, and the nature and method of the relevant crime was very poor. The Defendant was sentenced to a fine for attempted larceny, once the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for the attempted larceny, and two times the punishment was sentenced to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny). In particular, on November 5, 2014, the Gwangju District Court sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Gwangju District Court on April 3, 2016 and committed each of the instant crimes on April 3, 2016, while the execution of the said punishment was completed, and even during the repeated offense period, and the Defendant did not agree with the victims.

On the other hand, the circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows: (a) the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case as well as reflects the mistake; (b) the amount of damage by the victims is not so significant; and (c) the seized stolen goods were returned to the victim X and the damage was partially recovered.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 처단형의 범위: 징역 3년 6월 ~ 25년 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 기본범죄: 피해자 AB에 대한 강도 상해죄 [ 유형의 결정] 강도범죄 > 상해의 결과가 발생한 경우 > 제 2 유형( 특수강도) [ 특별 양형 인자] 감경요소: 상해결과가 발생하였으나 기본범죄가 미 수에 그친 경우 [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 감경영역, 징역 3년 ~ 6년 경합범죄 1: 피해자 AA에 대한 강도 상해죄 [ 유형의 결정] 강도범죄 > 상해의 결과가...