1. On November 26, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition of bereaved family benefits and funeral expense against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 26, 1999, the network B (C life; hereinafter “the network”) entered Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tsung”) and worked as a production-based worker (alate) at the D workplace 2 Ra until he retires on February 29, 2004.

B. Around April 2008, the Deceased was diagnosed as a acute breathal leukosis and died at the age of 29 years on November 24, 2009 during treatment.

The diagnosis of death determined the deceased's direct death with a parosis, and the preceding death was determined as a leuk blood disease.

C. On May 14, 2010, the Plaintiff, the deceased’s spouse, claimed the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses, while the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents.

On June 23, 2010, pursuant to Article 22 of the Enforcement Rule of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and Article 107-2 (1) 2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Industrial Safety and Health Act, the defendant requested the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency to conduct an epidemiological investigation on the cause

Accordingly, the main contents of the results of the epidemiological investigation conducted by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Institute (hereinafter "the epidemiological investigation of this case") are as follows, and the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Institute Evaluation Committee held on December 2, 2010 to assess the results of the epidemiological investigation conducted by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Institute (hereinafter "the results of the epidemiological investigation of this case") are opinions (six persons) and opinions that it is difficult to view that the exposure level to seven members of the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Institute, among nine members, is the level of natural exposure and that it is difficult to deem that the exposure level was an occupational exposure even in the results of the epidemiological research, as the level of natural exposure level is the level of exposure.

The view that it is not a occupational accident is that it is difficult to completely eliminate or recognize the relationship between the disease and the work because it is difficult to judge the past work environment accurately, working for five years at the young age.

I have presented their respective views for reservation of this decision.