logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.10.05 2017고단1177
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

8,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) in the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment on September 7, 2017 became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a former police officer who served as a reporter of the C press from around 2013 to the present time through a local newspaper B, a local newspaper, and is a person who is engaged in activities as a reporter with access to a horse.

1. On February 2009, the Defendant violated D’s name fraud and defense justice in the name of the purchase of D number contracts, and the Defendant expressed to the effect that, in response to the request of the senior public officials of the G Mart’s “victims” in the G Mart’s operation of the Victim F, the Defendant would make it possible to purchase D’s money by means of a contract with the senior public officials of the G Mart, who were in the vicinity of HHE I Mart.

However, the facts are that D is an administrative property at the time of so-called Ma that it is impossible to sell it to the private sector, so even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to allow the injured party to purchase it through a contract with a number of real estate.

On February 12, 2009, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim, to the Defendant’s corporate bank account on February 12, 2009, and received KRW 5 million in cash on August 7, 2009, and KRW 2 million in cash on February 17, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving property, received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the affairs handled by the public officials at the same time.

2. On November 201, 2013, the Defendant: (a) knew that on the grounds of the charge imposed on a person responsible for the management of a sewerage system; (b) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant would impose KRW 5,170,00,00 on the commercial building owned by the victim F located in the JJ at Ypopoon; and (c) around that time, the Defendant would prevent the Defendant from imposing the charge imposed on the person responsible for the management of the relevant water supply and sewerage system by soliciting the public officials in charge of the management of

arrow